It's still one of the better choices in this price range, as long as you don't mind the inaccurate yellows. It favors multitasking and allows you to see more details of your gaming arena. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a bitbetter than the Dell Alienware AW2521H. Its 24.5 inch screen provides a decent amount of space to work with, and its outstanding ergonomics allow you to position it however you like. The ASUS VG249Q1A's refresh rate can be overclocked up to 165Hz, but only over a DisplayPort connection. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM is an excellent IPS monitor that delivers a smooth and responsive gaming experience. Motion looks exceptionally smooth and you shouldn't notice any motion artifacts. The VG249Q1A has a 24" screen with a 1080p resolution, while the VG279AQL1A has a 27" screen with a 1440p resolution. The Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate, faster response time at 60Hz, and gets brighter. so that you can compare the results easily. For the most part, the ASUS performs better because it has a much higher refresh rate of 280Hz and faster response timesat max refresh rate. The LG 27GN650-B has the same design as most other 2020 LG UltraGear monitors, like the LG 27GN850-B. If intense glare is an issue and you need a monitor that gets brighter, check out the Gigabyte M27Q. The ROG series is meant to be more premium while the TUF series is more budget-friendly. They are very similarly built and look almost identical, but the IPS panel of the VG259QM has wider viewing angles and a slightly better contrast ratio. The ergonomics are terrible, which makes it hard to get a comfortable viewing position. The AOC is a gaming monitor witha 144Hz refresh rate, a much faster response time, and lower input lag. It has a relatively small screen, which means you don't get much space to work with, and its resolution is limited to 1080p. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. The main differences are that the HP has a smaller 24 inch screen, and it doesn't support HDR. This eliminates motion duplication and helps reduce eye strain. The ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are two very similar-performing monitors. The ASUS gets brighter, its IPS panel has much wider viewing angles, and it has better motion handling due to its higher refresh rate and faster response time. While it's not the most immersive, some gamers might prefer the smaller size because it's easier to see the entire screen for better environmental awareness in games. The Dell Alienware AW2521H and the Acer Predator XB273UGXbmiipruzx are very different gaming monitors. There's a dedicated sRGB mode color option that you can activate on top of the active Picture Mode, but it's slightly less accurate than the 'Standard' mode. It provides a responsive and smooth gaming experience with its low input lag and high refresh rate. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has exceptional response time at its max refresh rate, resulting in almost no blur trail behind fast-moving objects. On the other hand, the Dell is a 1080p, 360Hz monitor with an IPS panel. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Acer Nitro VG271UP Pbmiipx. The ergonomics are terrible. The TUF Gaming VG27AQ has an excellent SDR color gamut that covers most of the common sRGB color space, with okay coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color space, which might not be enough for professional photo editors. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM only supports basic 1080p formats from the PS5. It also has wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for playing co-op or sharing content. It's an IPS monitor with a 24 inch screen and 1080p resolution. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV are very different monitors. The remaining inaccuracies aren't visible to the naked eye. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the MSI Optix G273. Thanks to its IPS panel, the image remains accurate at an angle, but blacks look gray in a dark room. The AW2521H has a 360Hz refresh rate, it supports HDR, has significantly better gradient handling, and lower input lag. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has good reflection handling. It has perfect coverage of the sRGB color space used in most content and decent coverage of the Adobe RGB color space used in photo editing. The best budget HDR gaming monitor we've tested is the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM. Also, it supports VRR to reduce screen tearing, which the BenQ doesn't. The LG 27GN650-B has sub-par ergonomics. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The AOC CQ27G2 has the same control scheme as the older AOC CQ27G1, but they've changed the buttons a bit. This can get distracting in dark scenes. It's okay for gaming in HDR, although it's mainly due to its great gaming performance, as it doesn't get bright enough for a true HDR experience, has a low contrast ratio, and lacks local dimming. It can't display a downscaled 1440p or 4k signal, and since the Xbox only supports HDR at 4k, this means that this monitor doesn't support HDR at all from the Xbox. The Dell Alienware AW2521H is good for office use. On the other hand, the AOC has better contrast, so it might be a better choice for a dark room. Increasing the MBR setting decreases the amount of time each frame is visible on the screen, causing the apparent brightness to decrease, but improving the appearance of motion. Here you can vote for our next review, Create or edit custom monitor ratings, your custom ratings will be present on the table tool, and other pages. The ASUS VG249Q1A has an optional Black Frame Insertion feature to improve motion clarity, called ELMB in the settings menu. The ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD is a good 27 inch, 1440p monitor with great peak brightness and wide viewing angles. Driven by data, run by a passionate team of engineers, testers, technical writers, developers, and more. Though they both have an IPS panel, the ASUS has a much better contrast ratio and black uniformity. Best Gaming Monitors (Fall 2020) - High Refresh Rate Battle. The AOC CQ27G2 has a very similar design to the AOC CQ27G1, but with a silver stand instead of black. They're both 1440p monitors with a native 144Hz refresh rate, but the ASUS can be overclocked to 165Hz. The Acer's 144Hz native refresh rate can be overclocked to 165Hz, which the HP can't do. It has trouble displaying both bright and dark colors at different luminance levels. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM are almost identical, as it's mostly a size difference between them. It shares many similarities with its bigger brother, the ASUS VG279QM, as it also has a 1080p resolution and a 280Hz refresh rate.It has great visibility in bright environments thanks to its great peak brightness, but on the contrary, it isn't as well The Dell Alienware AW2521H is great overall. It has a significantly higher refresh rate of 280Hz, resulting in smoother motion and better responsiveness. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has decent HDR peak brightness. It supports HDR, whereas the VG249Q1A doesn't, but it doesn't add much because it can't display a wide color gamut. There are no noticeable gaps, and the bottom of the border is uniform. However, the ASUS has a Black Frame Insertion feature that works simultaneously with VRR to improve motion clarity. Its smaller screen size is okay for work if you only have one or two windows openat a time, but it's not ideal for multitasking. The 27", 1440p screen delivers a sharp image that should please most people, and doesn't require a top of the line graphics card to achieve decent frame rates when gaming. Unfortunately, even though it supports HDR, it doesn't display a wide color gamut for HDR content and can't get bright enough to bring out highlights. Buy ASUS TUF Gaming 24.5 1080P HDR Monitor VG258QM - Full HD, 280Hz (Supports 144Hz), 0.5ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, DisplayHDR 400, Rtings measured 35ms at 60Hz, meaning this monitor is unusable at 60Hz, and has over triple what most gaming monitors get (10ms or lower). The stand is relatively small and doesn't take up too much desk space. However, the ASUS has better reflection handling andbetter color accuracy. Can't display deep blacks in a dark room. The Acer Predator X27 and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are very different monitors. Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. The HDR color volume is okay. VA and a great budget option for 144hz 1080p. We purchase our own monitors and The ASUS has significantly better ergonomics, a bit better reflection handling, a wider BFI flicker range, and it has built-in speakers. The latter's larger screen size and higher resolution makeit more versatile and better suited for work and media consumption. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the MSI Oculux NXG253R are extremely similar overall, but the ASUS is slightly better for gaming. Some websites are still reporting the original information. The screen may be a bit small for multitasking since there's less room to have multiple windows opened side-by-side, but it's a good size for a 1080p display, as it makes the pixel density higher. As for the ASUS, it feels better built, and it has much better ergonomics because it has a wider swivel range, and you can rotate it into portrait mode in both directions. Like most VA monitors, it has a high native contrast ratio, which delivers deep blacks, but this comes at the expense of viewing angles, which are disappointing. Overall, the Acer Nitro XF243Y is much better than the BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the Razer Raptor 27 144Hz. The ASUS is also better for office use, as the greater screen real estate is better for multitasking. It's bright enough for a dark to moderately-lit room, but it might not be able to overcome intense glare in a well-lit room. They both have similar motion handling but the ViewSonic has a more versatile backlight strobing feature as you can adjust the pulse width and phase to your liking. The ASUS is an inch bigger than the Acer. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is better overall than theDell G2722HS. TheASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A is much better than the AOC CQ27G2. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx's build quality is decent, very similar to the Acer Nitro XF252Q. It should be okay for most gamers, but it isn't the best for work and media consumption. It's more important if you have a multi-monitor setup where it's mounted above eye level. Jun 16, 2022: Restructured article due to reflect user needs; replaced the ASUS VG279QM and the ASUS VG259QM with the ViewSonic XG2431 because it's better; LG 27GN750-B because it's easier to find and it's better, and renamed to 'Higher Refresh Rate Alternative'; added the ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QM to Notable Mentions. The Samsung is a better choice for dark rooms and provides a better HDR experience due to its higher peak brightness. If you want something that can downscale a 4k signal, then check out the ViewSonic XG2431. Finally, you can stay assured of a responsive editing experience due to the monitor's remarkably low input lag. Im happy with it, it also beats all my previous gaming monitors ive ever tested and its top rating on rtings, and I can see why. It displays most scenes at the correct brightness, though, except for bright scenes, which are a bit too bright. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx has an exceptionally low input lag, resulting in an extremely responsive gaming experience. put them under the same test bench, If you often share your screen with others, the Dell has wider viewing angles, but it doesn't allow for any swivel adjustment, which the AOC does. The screen's brightness is locked in this picture mode. It also has a much quicker response time at its max refresh rate, it has lower input lag and much better ergonomics. This is normal and is due to the way we measure DCI P3. The LG 27GN650-B is a great gaming monitor. It's again very consistent when displaying different scenes. The ASUS has an IPS panel with much wider viewing angles,a much higher refresh rate, and it gets significantly brighter. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The above video is provided for reference only. This is an okay monitor for multimedia. The Acer has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles. There are other TUF Gaming modelsavailable, some of which are listed below. put them under the same test bench, The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A doesn't support HDR. Note that the BFI score is based on the minimum and maximum frequency at which it operates, not the BFI's performance. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? Other than that, these two monitors are remarkably similar. Buy ASUS TUF Gaming VG279Q1A 27 Gaming Monitor, 1080P Full HD, 165Hz (Supports 144Hz), IPS, 1ms, Adaptive-sync/FreeSync Premium, Extreme Low Motion Blur, RTINGS.com . Pixel density might bee too low for some. If you want a gaming monitor with an even wider SDR color gamut, check out the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) makes diagonal lines look bolder, but vertical lines look thinner. Before calibration, the ASUS VG259QM has good color accuracy. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is an excellent gaming monitor. While they both have a native 144Hz refresh rate, the ASUS is overclockable to 165Hz. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the LG 27GL83A for mixed usage. It only works within a narrow refresh rate range, and it isn't usable simultaneously with VRR. Gamma follows the target curve well, but some scenes may be too dark. It's also better suited for well-lit rooms because it gets a lot brighter. The 60Hz response time is decent. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is slightly better than the ASUS TUF VG27AQ. The backlight is flicker-free at all brightness levels. SEE PRICE. It's almost identical to the SDR peak brightness, so HDR content doesn't look much different from SDR. The ASUS is a 1440p monitor and the Samsung has a 4k resolution. There are many monitors in the TUF Gaminglineup, some of which you can seein the table below. The smaller screen size and 1080p resolution are somewhat limiting for work and media consumption because there's less space for multitasking, and it doesn't feel as immersive. The Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx is a much better monitor than the MSI Optix G27C6, but they have different panel types. It gets bright enough to combat glare in well-lit rooms, and it has good reflection handling. However, even though it can display a wide color gamut, it doesn't get very bright in HDR, not enough to make highlights pop the way they should. The Dell Alienware AW2521H has a flicker-free backlight, which helps reduce eye strain. It's incredibly consistent when displaying different content and slightly brighter than the advertised 250 cd/m, but it's still not bright enough to overcome intense glare. Motion looks much better on the Acer thanks to the much quicker response time, and it has a slightly faster 165Hz refresh rate. There are a few extra features on the AOC CQ27G2: We tested the 27 inch AOC CQ27G2, which replaces the AOC CQ27G1, which we've also tested. The Acer Nitro XF243Y and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM are both 1080p IPS gaming monitors, but the ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, 280Hz compared to the Acer's 165Hz. The Samsung has a native 165Hz refresh rate, and while the ASUS has a native refresh rate of 144Hz, you can overclock it to 165Hz. Some websites are still reporting the original information. However, the ergonomics are somewhat limited, and while it has a large 27 inch screen, its 1080p resolution isn't ideal if you tend to work with higher-resolution content. This eliminates image duplication and helps reduce eye strain. It's one of the first few monitors released with an extremely high 360Hz refresh rate, which helps deliver anincredible response time with silky smooth motion. This mode is actually a hidden setting that has to be enabled through the service menu (find out how here). This monitor has great resolution and size, a very low input lag, fantastic response time, wide viewing angles, and excellent ergonomics. The Samsung is a 144op, 240Hz monitor with a VA panel. VRR works, but if you toggle it off and on while connected to a Mac, it sends the monitor into power save mode. The color temperature is quite cold, giving everything a slightly bluish tint. Finally, the monitor's excellent ergonomics make it easy to position it comfortably on your desk. There's no cable management. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the Acer Nitro XF243Y Pbmiiprx areIPS gaming monitors with a 24" screen, 1080p resolution, and a 165Hz refresh rate. There are no noticeable issues in shades of gray, and most colors are displayed accurately. We managed to reach 295 cd/m before calibration in the 'HDR Effect' Picture Mode, with Contrast set to max, but this comes at the cost of image accuracy. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the ViewSonic XG2431 are both great gaming monitors. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG259QM and the MSI Optix MAG161V are very different displays with different intended uses, so they're not really directly comparable. It's slightly higher at 60Hz, which is typical, but it shouldn't be noticeable to most people. Also, the ASUS has a 165Hz refresh rate compared to Samsung's 120Hz, but the Samsung's VA panelhas a higher native contrast ratio and better reflection handling. Mediocre HDR peak brightness. The HDR peak brightness is okay. We measured the BFI input lag in the 'Turbo' mode. The Acer is an ultrawidewithmuch wider viewing angles, faster response time, and gets a lot brighter to combat glare. so that you can compare the results easily. Jul 27, 2022: Restructured article to reflect the current price of monitors; replaced the ASUS VG259QM with the ViewSonic XG2431 because it's better; removed the Gigabyte M27Q and the Dell S2722QC because they're expensive; replaced the Acer XV340CK with the easier-to-find Dell S3422DWG; added the LG 27GN800-B as the 'Best Console Gaming Monitor'. On the other hand, the MSI is much brighter, and it has better reflection handling, making it a better choice for a bright room. The Acer is a 4k monitor with native G-SYNC support, while the ASUS hasa 1440p resolution and has native FreeSync support. It delivers a great gaming experience, with low input lag, excellent response time, and support for AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology to reduce screen tearing, but it has very few additional gaming features. It delivers a very responsive gaming experience thanks to its remarkably low input lag, and it has a very fast refresh rate that improves the overall appearance of motion. If you want a 1440p monitor with a quicker response time, then look into the MSI Optix G273QF. The color temperature is still in the same ballpark, just a little warmer than our 6500K target. The ASUS performs better overall, as it has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles, and it has better ergonomics as well asa faster response time. Note that some tests, such asgray uniformity, may vary between individual units. They let you turn the monitor ON/Off and navigate the on-screen menu. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? It gets brighter and has wider viewing angles. The TN panel, however, doesn't offer a significant advantage, as the VG259QM is a bit better in most ways that matter. There's only a tiny amount of banding in the reds, but it shouldn't be noticeable in most content. The Dell is a native G-SYNC monitor with a 360Hz refresh rate, so it's a better choice if you play high-frame-rate games on an NVIDIA graphics card, but FreeSync doesn't work on it. It also has better ergonomics and supports HDR. Colors appear washed out when you reach moderate viewing angles, and brightness decreases as well. If you need FreeSync, the ViewSonic has native FreeSync support and G-SYNC also works on it, but it has a lower 240Hz refresh rate. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio that makes blacks appear grayish in the dark, and its sub-par ergonomics make it hard to place the screen at a comfortable viewing position. Unfortunately, there are some issues when using this monitor with a MacBook. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A isn't ideal for media creation. Refresh rates up to 120Hz work, but HDR only works at 60Hz. It's excellent for gaming thanks to its extremely high 360Hz refresh rate, G-SYNC support, exceptionally low input lag, and incredible response time. The VG279QM is slightly better, as it has wider viewing angles, better color accuracy, and gets much brighter in HDR.
Mn Conservation Officer Salary,
Mcdonald's Shift Manager Resume Example,
Pixel Fade Minecraft Skin,
Cetaphil Antibacterial Soap Ingredients,
Msg Side Effects Long Term,
Danaher Holidays 2022,
Great American Recipe Pbs,
The Use Of Function Call_user_func Is Discouraged,
Al Bahrain Vs Busaiteen Livescore,
Highest Paying Remote Data Science Jobs,
Importance Of Philosophy Of Education To A Teacher Pdf,