The Gigabyte M27Q and the Gigabyte M32Q are very similar overall, but the M32Q is slightly better for most people. The MSI has better ergonomics; if that doesn't matter to you, the LG has better reflection handling and a larger screen. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the LG has better horizontal viewing angles. M32Q. The Gigabyte has a better height adjustment and has a better selection of additional features, including a built-in KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) switch, meaning you can control two computers with a single set of input devices. AORUS FV43U. Amazon.com. The LG has more screen real estate, a faster refresh rate, better black uniformity, and it's more accurate out of the box. The LG has an ultrawide curved screen, which delivers a more immersive gaming experience. Replaced the Dell S2722QC, LG 27GP850-B, and the LG 27GN800-B with the Gigabyte M27Q X, ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ, and the Dell S2721QS because they're better choices for their categories. G27Q. M32Q. Get this if you want a monitor more for gaming, but the ASUS is better overall for productivity. The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the LG 32GP850-B are similar overall, and the differences between them are minor. M32Q. M32Q. The Gigabyte M32Q and the LG 32GP850-B are nearly identical, with only a few minor differences. ROG Strix XG27AQ. G27Q. SEE PRICE. The LG, on the other hand, has better ergonomics and seems to be better built. It has a 32-inch screen with a 1440p resolution, and as it's meant for gaming, it has a 165Hz refresh rate with FreeSync variable refresh rate It has the same 32-inch, LG 32GP850-B: The LG 32GP850-B is essentially a larger version of the LG 27GP850-B with very similar performance. On the other hand, the Dell has better ergonomics, a slightly faster refresh rate, and better vertical viewing angles. See our review; LG 27GP850-B: The LG 27GP850-B is essentially a 27-inch version of the LG 32GP850-B. It's a Costco-exclusive model that's similar to the LG 32GN650-B with a few differences in performance primarily regarding the response times, but it has all the same features. If you're on a tighter budget, then the LG 27GN800-B is a good alternative. The LG 32GP850-B is slightly better than the Gigabyte M27Q. M34WQ. M32Q. Gigabyte M32Q. Replaced the Dell S2722QC, LG 27GP850-B, and the LG 27GN800-B with the Gigabyte M27Q X, ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ, and the Dell S2721QS because they're better choices for their categories. AORUS FV43U. The LG has more screen real estate, a faster refresh rate, better black uniformity, and it's more accurate out of the box. Gigabyte M32Q. If you're on a tighter budget, then the LG 27GN800-B is a good alternative. The LG 32GP850-B and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are very similar overall, but the LG is better for gaming. you can still get excellent gaming performance with a mid-range monitor like the Gigabyte M32U. ASUS. The 32GP850 has a faster refresh rate, a faster response time, and the unit we tested has better black uniformity. The 32 inch model is more accurate out of the box, and the 27 inch model has better text clarity due to the higher pixel density. The Gigabyte has a better height adjustment and has a better selection of additional features, including a built-in KVM (Keyboard, Video, Mouse) switch, meaning you can control two computers with a single set of input devices. The Gigabyte M32Q and the LG 32GP850-B are nearly identical, with only a few minor differences. The LG has an ultrawide curved screen, which delivers a more immersive gaming experience. M34WQ. GIGABYTE FI32Q : . The Gigabyte has a higher resolution screen, better ergonomics, a more versatile black frame insertion feature, and it supports HDMI 2.1, making it a better choice for next-gen console gamers. M34WQ. The best monitor for vertical use we've tested is the Dell U2723QE. The LG, on the other hand, has better ergonomics and seems to be better built. The Gigabyte M32Q is slightly better than the LG 27GP850-B. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the LG has better horizontal viewing angles. ROG Strix XG27AQ. The LG has an optional black frame insertion feature, better reflection handling, and a better response time. The best monitor for vertical use we've tested is the Dell U2723QE. G27Q. It has the same 32-inch, LG 32GP850-B: The LG 32GP850-B is essentially a larger version of the LG 27GP850-B with very similar performance. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 32GN650-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and disadvantages, but the 32GP850-B is better for most people. G34WQC. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the LG has better horizontal viewing angles. Its stand offers impressive ergonomics, including rotating it into portrait mode in either direction, so you can choose which side to put the inputs on, which is convenient if you have your PC directly on one side of the monitor. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the horizontal viewing angles are better on the LG. ASUS. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 32GN600-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses, but overall, the 32GP850-B is better for most people. The Gigabyte M32Q is a lower-end version of the Gigabyte M32U but with a lower 1440p resolution instead. The 32GP850 has better ergonomics, much better viewing angles, and a much faster response time. G34WQC. AORUS FV43U. The 32GP850 has better ergonomics, much better viewing angles, and a much faster response time. M32Q. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the LG has better horizontal viewing angles. M27Q X. Apple Studio Display. AORUS FV43U. ASUS. AORUS FV43U. While the Gigabyte M32Q is a great monitor for gaming, if you're a competitive gamer and you want the best gaming monitor under $500, you'll want something with a higher refresh rate, like the Gigabyte M27Q X. The LG 32GP850-B is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF, but the main differences are minor and could be due to panel variance. The LG 27GP950-B is a bit better than the Gigabyte M27Q for most uses. AORUS FV43U. M32Q. M34WQ. G34WQC. M34WQ. It's an impressive overall office monitor with a ton of features. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution screen, better ergonomics, a more versatile black frame insertion feature, and it supports HDMI 2.1, making it a better choice for next-gen console gamers. Get this if you want a monitor more for gaming, but the ASUS is better overall for productivity. Like the LG 27GP950-B and the LG 32GP850-B, it's part of LG's gaming lineup, but it still provides decent overall performance for different uses, which is helpful if you're on a budget and want something for productivity and gaming. The Gigabyte AORUS FI32U is slightly better overall than the LG 32GP850-B. Removed the Gigabyte AORUS FV43U and the Acer Nitro XF243Y and added the HP The LG also has a slightly faster response time, and it's a native G-SYNC monitor. See our review; LG 27GP850-B: The LG 27GP850-B is essentially a 27-inch version of the LG 32GP850-B. SEE PRICE. ASUS. If you're on a tighter budget, then the LG 27GN800-B is a good alternative. you can still get excellent gaming performance with a mid-range monitor like the Gigabyte M32U. AORUS FV43U. The LG 32GP850-B is slightly better than the Gigabyte M27Q. The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the LG 32GP850-B are similar overall, and the differences between them are minor. M32Q. Oct 26, 2022: Restructured article to reflect user needs for the Xbox One X. SEE PRICE. Gigabyte M27Q: The Gigabyte M27Q is a budget-friendly display with more gaming features than the ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV. Amazon.com. The Gigabyte M32Q is a lower-end version of the Gigabyte M32U but with a lower 1440p resolution instead. M34WQ. M27Q X. Apple Studio Display. G34WQC. The MSI has better ergonomics; if that doesn't matter to you, the LG has better reflection handling and a larger screen. AORUS FV43U. The Gigabyte AORUS FI32U is slightly better overall than the LG 32GP850-B. G34WQC. Oct 26, 2022: Restructured article to reflect user needs for the Xbox One X. G27Q. Its stand offers impressive ergonomics, including rotating it into portrait mode in either direction, so you can choose which side to put the inputs on, which is convenient if you have your PC directly on one side of the monitor. G27Q. The LG 32GN63T-B is a budget gaming monitor. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 32GN650-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and disadvantages, but the 32GP850-B is better for most people. Replaced the Dell S2722QC, LG 27GP850-B, and the LG 27GN800-B with the Gigabyte M27Q X, ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ, and the Dell S2721QS because they're better choices for their categories. They perform very similarly gaming-wise; the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, but the LG has a better response time. The LG has a higher resolution screen and much better text clarity, so it's a bit better for media creators or office use. G34WQC. M32Q. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the LG has better horizontal viewing angles. M27Q X. Apple Studio Display. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 32GN600-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and weaknesses, but overall, the 32GP850-B is better for most people. See our review; LG 27GP850-B: The LG 27GP850-B is essentially a 27-inch version of the LG 32GP850-B. The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the LG 32GP850-B are similar overall, and the differences between them are minor. M27Q X. Apple Studio Display. The Gigabyte M32Q and the LG 32GP850-B are nearly identical, with only a few minor differences. Gigabyte M32Q. The 32 inch model is more accurate out of the box, and the 27 inch model has better text clarity due to the higher pixel density. The best monitor for vertical use we've tested is the Dell U2723QE. The LG 27GN850-B and the Gigabyte M27Q are both great 1440p IPS gaming monitors. ASUS. The LG 32GP850-B is a bit better than the LG 27GL850-B. IPS 2K QHD( x )2K ppi. M27Q X. Apple Studio Display. The Gigabyte AORUS FI32U is slightly better overall than the LG 32GP850-B. M34WQ. The Gigabyte M27Q and the Gigabyte M32Q are very similar overall, but the M32Q is slightly better for most people. you can still get excellent gaming performance with a mid-range monitor like the Gigabyte M32U. Gigabyte M32Q. The LG also has two HDMI 2.1 ports, making it The Gigabyte M32Q is slightly better than the LG 27GP850-B. While the Gigabyte M32Q is a great monitor for gaming, if you're a competitive gamer and you want the best gaming monitor under $500, you'll want something with a higher refresh rate, like the Gigabyte M27Q X. The Gigabyte has a higher resolution screen, better ergonomics, a more versatile black frame insertion feature, and it supports HDMI 2.1, making it a better choice for next-gen console gamers. The LG 32GP850-B is a bit better than the LG 27GL850-B. On the other hand, the Dell has better ergonomics, a slightly faster refresh rate, and better vertical viewing angles. Removed the Gigabyte AORUS FV43U and the Acer Nitro XF243Y and added the HP The Gigabyte, on the other hand, has a flat 16:9 display, which some content creators might prefer, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature. ASUS. Gigabyte M32Q. It's a Costco-exclusive model that's similar to the LG 32GN650-B with a few differences in performance primarily regarding the response times, but it has all the same features. IPS 2K QHD( x )2K ppi. The Gigabyte M32Q and the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are very similar overall. The LG has a higher resolution screen and much better text clarity, so it's a bit better for media creators or office use. G27Q. M32Q. The Gigabyte M32Q and the Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are very similar overall. G34WQC. The LG has an ultrawide curved screen, which delivers a more immersive gaming experience. They perform very similarly gaming-wise; the Gigabyte has a higher refresh rate of 170Hz, but the LG has a better response time. The Gigabyte offers more features, such as a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and charging, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM. The LG 32GP850-B and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are very similar overall, but the LG is better for gaming. ASUS. The Gigabyte M32Q is a lower-end version of the Gigabyte M32U but with a lower 1440p resolution instead. The Gigabyte offers more features, such as a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and charging, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM. The Gigabyte M27Q and the Gigabyte M32Q are very similar overall, but the M32Q is slightly better for most people. The LG 32GP850-B is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF, but the main differences are minor and could be due to panel variance. ROG Strix XG27AQ. G34WQC. The Gigabyte M32Q and the LG 32GP850-B are nearly identical, with only a few minor differences. ASUS. The Gigabyte M27Q is slightly better than the LG 27GP83B-B, but the differences are minor overall. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 32GN650-B use different panel technologies, each with strengths and disadvantages, but the 32GP850-B is better for most people. The LG 32GP850-B and the LG 27GP850-B are nearly identical. SEE PRICE. The Gigabyte, on the other hand, has a flat 16:9 display, which some content creators might prefer, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature. The LG has more screen real estate, a faster refresh rate, better black uniformity, and it's more accurate out of the box. The 32 inch model is more accurate out of the box, and the 27 inch model has better text clarity due to the higher pixel density. The Gigabyte has better vertical viewing angles, but the horizontal viewing angles are better on the LG. ROG Strix XG27AQ. It's an impressive overall office monitor with a ton of features. G27Q. The Gigabyte offers more features, such as a USB-C input that supports DisplayPort and charging, a Picture-in-Picture mode, and a KVM. G27Q. M32Q. AORUS FV43U. The Gigabyte M27Q is slightly better than the LG 27GP83B-B, but the differences are minor overall. Gigabyte M32Q. AORUS FV43U. G27Q. Removed the Gigabyte AORUS FV43U and the Acer Nitro XF243Y and added the HP The M32Q has better ergonomics, with a stand that can swivel and a wider height adjustment. Like the LG 27GP950-B and the LG 32GP850-B, it's part of LG's gaming lineup, but it still provides decent overall performance for different uses, which is helpful if you're on a budget and want something for productivity and gaming.